Michael D. Ross, Attorney

Monday, February 14, 2011

While the fate of the TVU students are uncertain, Susan Su and Tri Valley University are getting a “free ride”!

While the fate of the TVU students are uncertain, Susan Su and Tri Valley University are getting a “free ride”!

Here is a link to the article I wrote for my friend Shah Peerally: http://immigrationlegalblog.com/

What do you have when the wrong people are being targeted by the federal government? What happens when the victims of a crime either get prosecuted and/or have to face removal proceedings, and the real perpetrator walks away without getting so much as getting her hair mussed? You have a situation like the Tri-Valley University (TVU) scandal, that’s what.

As a criminal defense attorney, and a former special prosecutor, I took an immediate interest in the TVU matter. As with all cases that I accept, I tried to look at the TVU case both from a defense lawyer’s and a prosecutor’s point of view. My conclusion? The wrong people are being targeted, namely, the TVU students who, for the most part, appear to be acting in good faith and engaged in vigorous academic study. Indeed, the federal government appears to being pandering to the current national pandemic of xenophobic, anti-immigration sentiment that unfortunately does exist in the hearts of many ill-informed Americans.

The federal government has labeled TVU as a “sham university,” with its students, mostly from India, painted as the evildoers who have subverted the educational Visa system. Some of the students claim, with good reason in my opinion, that they have been treated “like dogs” by federal investigators. Some have even have been forced to wear GPS ankle cuffs – even when no charges have been brought against that person.

What bothers me, and, I respectfully submit, should also bother federal immigration and criminal prosecution attorneys, is that the TVU administration has apparently been given a de facto immunity in exchange for its cooperation with the feds. The so-called forfeiture proceedings against the “assets” of TVU, mostly virtual as they are, is a meaningless diverting maneuver from punishing the real wrong-doers in this mess. As Charles Dickens once wrote, “If the law think this, then the law is an ass.”

What would I do if I were in charge of the federal case against the TVU students? Instead of harrassing those who have been victimized and are now being investigated, I would craft a criminal complaint charging TVU Dean Susan Su and her board of directors with the colossal fraud in gulling hundreds of well-meaning Indian students into enrolling in, and following the procedural rules of, TVU. Add on a count for wholesale conspiracy to undermine the immigration laws of the United States, at the expense of the students who have paid so much to get into TVU, and who may now pay an even higher penalty of being removed from our country.

We are a nation of immigrants, and I as an American am very proud of that fact. However, the persecution of those visitors to the United States who merely fell victim to a major white-collar crime stands the entire legal system of our country on its head, and if pursued ti this end, may result in an irremediable perversion of justice and immutable blot on our history as a nation.

Wednesday, January 26, 2011

JUSTICE TURNED ON ITS HEAD

The recent news story about undocumented domestic violence victims facing deportation demonstrates how strict application of a often randomly enforced law can lead to the absurd result of the victim suffering more punishment than the perpetrator. As Charles Dickens wrote nearly two centuries ago, "If the law think this, then the law is an ass."


In more and more cases, undocumented persons who are victims of crimes end up facing what is known as a deportation hearing. This is the pivotal stage of the so-called removal process, that is, the operation of immigration laws leading to deportation.


Law enforcement officials nation-wide are split on the benefits of such a policy by the federal government. On the one hand, it is argued that we should employ strict adherence to immigration violators in spite of the fact that they may have been the victims of violent crime. It is also argued that victims can, in some instances, too easily stage being a victim in order to somehow obtain legal status. On the other hand, some, such as the San Francisco Sheriff himself, argue that such strict enforcement leads to a pervasive lack of cooperation by undocumented persons with law enforcement. This can lead to the growth of organized crime, gangs, and a flood of individual violent crimes going like domestic violence left undeterred and unpunished.


The answer to this growing epidemic of undocumented domestic violence victims facing deportation is being hotly debated. Immigration reform is most often raised as the remedy to this problem, but such relief is not forthcoming soon. For now, the undocumented domestic violence victim may find himself or herself almost literally between a rack and a hard place, that is, unless Congress decides to address this sad and unjust situation with legislative relief for such victims.

Monday, August 17, 2009

Arrested? I can help.

When you or a loved one is arrested, it marks the beginning of a dangerous journey through the criminal justice system. To get the best outcome in your case, it is obviously in your best interests to retain a highly experienced, aggressive Bay Area criminal attorney as early as possible in the case.
I am Michael Ross, a San Francisco defense attorney practicing throughout the Northern California region. I started my legal career as a prosecutor, attaining the title of Deputy Attorney General. As such, I personally handled all Special Prosecutions as well as supervising and training new trial attorneys.
I later created a private defense practice spanning the last twenty years representing persons accused of committing a crime. In my very first jury trial for the defense, a case involving a mandatory sentence of “Life Without Possibility of Parole,” I won an acquittal (Not Guilty) verdict from the jury, and my client was free.
As a defense lawyer in San Francisco, I have handled virtually every type of criminal case, having personally handled over 3,500 felony and misdemeanor cases. I have handled cases ranging from a Death Penalty case (successfully), nearly fifty “Three Strikes” cases, nearly 1,100 felony cases, and over 2,500 misdemeanor cases.
As a Bay Area criminal lawyer, I very often represent clients as DUI defense attorney in San Francisco. I have handled alcohol-related vehicular homicide case, and I have represented over 1,000 clients in both non-injury and injury-involved DUI cases.
I believe that good representation in any type of case, even DUI cases, requires that your defense attorney have a broad background defending cases where the client’s freedom, or even life, is at stake. This is the kind of experience that I will bring to your case as your defense lawyer in San Francisco, and any of the outlying areas in Northern California.

ATTORNEY MICHAEL ROSS
473 JACKSON STREET, 3rd FLOOR
SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111-1607
(415) 345-1335
mdr@mikerosslaw.com
http://www.mikerosslaw.com